<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avastin in Stage II and III Colon Cancer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/dr_lenz/2009/06/avastin_in_stage_ii_and_iii_colon_cancer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/dr_lenz/2009/06/avastin_in_stage_ii_and_iii_colon_cancer</link>
	<description>We envision victory over colorectal cancer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heinz-Josef Lenz</title>
		<link>http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/dr_lenz/2009/06/avastin_in_stage_ii_and_iii_colon_cancer/comment-page-1#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>Heinz-Josef Lenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/?p=4981#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>but probably two years.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but probably two years&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heinz-Josef Lenz</title>
		<link>http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/dr_lenz/2009/06/avastin_in_stage_ii_and_iii_colon_cancer/comment-page-1#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>Heinz-Josef Lenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/?p=4981#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>hopefully in one year HJL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hopefully in one year HJL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j.d.</title>
		<link>http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/dr_lenz/2009/06/avastin_in_stage_ii_and_iii_colon_cancer/comment-page-1#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>j.d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/?p=4981#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>When will data become available on NO147? Are there any preliminary results?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will data become available on NO147? Are there any preliminary results?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heinz-Josef Lenz</title>
		<link>http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/dr_lenz/2009/06/avastin_in_stage_ii_and_iii_colon_cancer/comment-page-1#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator>Heinz-Josef Lenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/?p=4981#comment-1916</guid>
		<description>very well said. not that i dont use avastin but we need to know when and how. HJL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very well said. not that i dont use avastin but we need to know when and how. HJL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maen Addassi</title>
		<link>http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/dr_lenz/2009/06/avastin_in_stage_ii_and_iii_colon_cancer/comment-page-1#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>Maen Addassi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightcolorectalcancer.org/?p=4981#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>I think the Avastin is a big bubble should be finished for example: 
1.	Colorectal Cancer: with Oxaliplatin was not impressive. Only with Irinotecan also a negative result in early cancer
2.	Breast cancer with old product called Paclitaxel was given a good result (only progression free survival not overall survival)  but in the other hand with the newest &amp; most common drug Docetaxel with a trial called Avado trial ; it seems the result was not so impressive they tried to promoted the Hazard ratio rather than a clinical result. The median time to disease progression was 8 months with docetaxel alone, compared with 8.7 months with docetaxel plus low-dose bevacizumab, and 8.8 months with docetaxel plus high-dose Bevacizumab it is 0.8 months = 24 days !!!
3.	Lung cancer : at the beginning with Paclitaxel it was made a  good survival a trial called E4599 by A Sandler published at 2006 at NEJM it is add 2 months for overall survival (from 10.2 to 12.2 ) with  a double dose and of course a double cost. And at ATLAS study with Tarceva 1.3 Month more !!!
4.	Renal cell carcinoma : same story; without any advantages regarding survival 
Kindly note the British health system was refused Avastin for CRC and/or other indications due to lack cost effectiveness. They approved Cetuximab rather than Avastin
Is it worth this!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Avastin is a big bubble should be finished for example:<br />
1.	Colorectal Cancer: with Oxaliplatin was not impressive. Only with Irinotecan also a negative result in early cancer<br />
2.	Breast cancer with old product called Paclitaxel was given a good result (only progression free survival not overall survival)  but in the other hand with the newest &amp; most common drug Docetaxel with a trial called Avado trial ; it seems the result was not so impressive they tried to promoted the Hazard ratio rather than a clinical result. The median time to disease progression was 8 months with docetaxel alone, compared with 8.7 months with docetaxel plus low-dose bevacizumab, and 8.8 months with docetaxel plus high-dose Bevacizumab it is 0.8 months = 24 days !!!<br />
3.	Lung cancer : at the beginning with Paclitaxel it was made a  good survival a trial called E4599 by A Sandler published at 2006 at NEJM it is add 2 months for overall survival (from 10.2 to 12.2 ) with  a double dose and of course a double cost. And at ATLAS study with Tarceva 1.3 Month more !!!<br />
4.	Renal cell carcinoma : same story; without any advantages regarding survival<br />
Kindly note the British health system was refused Avastin for CRC and/or other indications due to lack cost effectiveness. They approved Cetuximab rather than Avastin<br />
Is it worth this!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

