Colonoscopies Not Perfect in Stopping Colorectal Cancer Deaths

The percentage of colorectal cancer deaths prevented by colonoscopy may be overestimated.

While still very effective in preventing colorectal cancer and deaths from the disease, limits of the test may be larger than previously thought.  Patients need to know that having colonoscopy does not guarantee that they won’t get colorectal cancer.

Experts now say that screening colonoscopy may reduce death from colorectal cancer by 60 to 70 percent and may not keep patients from dying from cancers on the right side of their colons at all.

A new Canadian study found that some people who died of colorectal cancer had a colonoscopy in the years before their cancer diagnosis.  A previous completed colonoscopy reduced chances of dying from colorectal cancer by two thirds in patients with cancers on the left side of their colons but did not decrease risk of death among those with right-sided cancers.

Working from the Ontario Cancer Registry, researchers identified 10,300 people who died from colorectal cancer in the seven years between 1996 and 2003.  They included only people aged 52 to 90 to ensure that the study would cover patients who had been eligible for colorectal cancer screening in the time before their diagnosis.

They then matched them to 51,500 controls, similar in age, sex, and social economic status, in order to perform a case-control study to determine how much colonoscopy decreased risk of death from colorectal cancer.

Among the 10,300 people who died from colorectal cancer, 719 or 7 percent had a colonoscopy 6 months or more before they were diagnosed with cancer.  Eight in ten of those colonoscopies were complete in reaching the cecum at the top of the colon, one in four included removal of polyps.  Among the 51,500 controls, 4000 or 9.8 percent had a colonoscopy, 1 in 5 had polyps removed.

Patients with previous colonoscopy whose cancers were on the left side of their colons had a 65 percent reduction in the risk of dying from their cancer, but there was no similar reduction in right-sided cancer death.

In analyzing their results, the researchers speculated that some reasons for colonoscopy not reducing risk for deaths from cancers on the right side of the colon were:

  • Poor bowel cleansing before colonoscopy.
  • Not completely evaluating the entire right colon.
  • Different biology for right-sided lesions including more flat or sessile polyps.
  • Different molecular basis for the cause and development of right-sided cancer.

Nancy Baxter, M.D., and her colleagues concluded,

Our study and others like it provide unique insight into colonoscopic approaches to prevent CRC death. In an Ontario-wide sample, colonoscopy is associated with a reduced risk for death from CRC arising from the left colon but not from the right colon. Although improvements in the quality of screening colonoscopy may narrow this difference, differences in tumor biology may limit the potential to prevent right-sided colon cancer deaths with current endoscopic technology.

In an associated editorial, David Ransohoff M.D. discussed the study, its limitations, and what it may mean as doctors talk to patients.  He recognized the problems with case control studies and the fact that medical records were not available to assess bowel preparation and colonoscopy completions.  However, he was also concerned that patients may be misled into thinking that colonoscopy protects more than it actually does.  He wrote,

These concerns and the authors’ results should make us worry that we might mislead our patients (and ourselves) by saying that colonoscopy reduces the risk for CRC death by 90%. Based on the considerations discussed earlier on case–control studies of sigmoidoscopy and randomized clinical trials of fecal occult blood testing that show CRC mortality reduction after colonoscopy (done because of a positive fecal occult blood testing result), a reasonable estimate—and what we should probably tell our patients—might be closer to a 60% to 70% reduction of the risk for death from CRC with high-quality colonoscopy. A 60% to 70% mortality reduction is not as good as 90%, but it should not be considered disappointing. It would be remarkably high compared with screening for other types of cancer, such as breast (with a 25% cancer mortality reduction at best) or prostate (with no proven cancer mortality reduction) cancer.

A video from the Annals of Internal Medicine explains the study and discusses the results with Dr. Baxter and Dr. Ransohoff.

SOURCE: Baxter et al., Annals of Internal Medicine, Early Release Article, December 16, 2008.

What This Means for Patients

New results from the Canadian study should not keep you from having a screening colonoscopy.

Colonoscopy does prevent death from colorectal cancer.  However, it has limits.  Colonoscopy will not completely protect you from getting colorectal cancer or dying from it.

Protect yourself further:

  • Be aware of the symptoms of colon and rectal cancer and insist on having them evaluated with another colonoscopy even if you have had a clear one in the past.
  • Follow colonoscopy prep instructions carefully and contact your doctor if the prep is not working.  Some gastroenterologists recommend splitting the prep into two parts — and doing the second part the day of the colonoscopy procedure to be sure the right colon is fully cleaned.
  • Choose an experienced gastroenterologist to do your colonoscopy, one who does several procedures a day and spends at least eight minutes withdrawing the scope.  If your doctor doesn’t find polyps in 25 percent of men and 15 percent of women examined, you may want to look for a more skilled doctor.

Comments

  1. Kate Murphy says

    MP — If you are having symptoms of colorectal cancer like seeing blood when you use the toilet, it is absolutely critical that you see a doctor and have a colonoscopy.

    Colon and rectal cancer can be treated! Left undiscovered and untreated, colorectal cancer becomes much more difficult to cure and treatment is much more difficult for patients.

    In the early stages, you may only need surgery. Even if you do need chemotherapy, there are much better ways to manage the diarrhea and nausea that may have been so hard for your father.

    I was first treated for colon cancer 25 years ago, and I am healthy and strong today. Two-thirds of colon cancers are cured. You can be one of those people.

    I am also concerned that your Dad’s cancer was found when he was young and you are also having symptoms in your 30’s. There are inherited colorectal cancers that affect young people (under 50). Even without symptoms, you should have a colonoscopy based on your father’s diagnosis.

    Bottom line: you’ve got symptoms (bleeding and fatigue) and you are at risk for cancer. Get to the doctor, get a colonoscopy.

    Waiting makes it worse. If you want more information and need help in finding a doctor call the C3 Answer Line at 877-4CRC-111 (877-427-2111)

  2. MP says

    My Dad died from Colon cancer when he was 39….found out he had it at 34…
    I found out I had symptoms at 33 and its getting worse at 35….never had a colonoscopy…tonight is the worse its ever been….Merry Christmas eh?

    Is it even worth trying to treat it with radiation?

    I saw what it did to my dad and I will never want to do the same thing for myself. So…. I look on the internet for worse case scenarios of untreated colon cancer and cannot find much.

    Besides seeing red when I wipe or being tired a lot (hey, I am a gamer, I stay up late)….am I really at risk? Yeah, only a doctor will be able to tell. But its the suggested treatment that I think will kill me, not the cancer!

  3. says

    Please note this, Freddy, my husband best friend had colonaoscopy, found nothing, one month later Advanced Metastatic adencarcinoma colon cancer, No tumor’s apparant, Lymph nodes all swollen, thought it was a gallbladder attack. No such luck. He has done 6 months of standard colon chemo,Just received results today 12-19-08 CT blood work, not worse,Merry W Christmas, Devastation is more like it, Freddy will continue with chemo for the rest of his life! Or until he doesn’t want to play.. The quality of that is not good. sick 8 day’s of the 14 day cycle. Colonoscopy’s need some help? Please inform of other testing.. Wife Linda Kaye, How do we go from here? Cancer is a lifesucking disease need more than what’s offered he is 52. I am an advocate in training and need way more help to ofer anyone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>