Congress passes stopgap funding bill to keep government running

Posted by Dusty Weaver on December 9th, 2006

Just before a midnight deadline Congress passed a stopgap funding bill and sent it to President George W. Bush for his signature. The bill passed the House by a 320-70 vote while the Senate backed it by unanimous consent.

Because Congress only passed two of the thirteen appropriations bills by the end of the 2006 Fiscal Year a continuing resolution was required to keep the U.S. government running. That resolution expired at midnight thus the rush to pass a replacement resolution.

Programs of interest to the colon and rectal cancer community are in the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education appropriations bill. Since this bill did not pass programs are funded at the level in the FY 2006 bill which means level funding continues.

I happened to pass by C-Span and noticed the House was considering House Joint Resolution (H. J. Res.) 102 which is the official name of this latest stopgap bill. I watched as Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.), House Appropriations Chair, and Rep. David Obey (D-Wis.), House Appropriations Ranking Member, spoke on the House floor about the bill.

From what was said on both sides of the aisle I have to agree with was Reuters said in its report: ”Both Republicans and Democrats in the House complained about having to pass the stopgap spending bill

According to the article Rep. Lewis “put blame ‘squarely…at the feet’ of retiring Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee, saying he had failed to move the spending bills through the Senate.” It also reported that Rep. Obey, the next chair of the House Appropriations Committee, ”called the temporary spending bill ‘a blatant admission of abject failure by the most useless Congress in modern times.’”

My sense is that both sides in the House tried to get all the spending bills passed and to the President before the end of the fiscal year. Rep. Obey said that Congress did not fulfill its responsibility in the process.

I am as upset about this as they are. Delay after delay then a big rush to get things done before close of business. I’d even go so far to say I agree with The Associated Press report which said this Congress “dumped an unfinished budget” on the next Congress.

What next? First off this muddies the waters for the President’s fiscal 2008 budget proposal which will be sent to Congress early next year as this year’s leftovers will delay things next year. To sped things up the remaining bills could be combined into an omnibus bill. Each bill could be reconsidered but it would more than likely be without major changes given the time constraints. It could be something else.

No matter what happens constituents affected by colon and rectal cancer need to keep reminding their Members of Congress to make cancer funding a priority.

Click here to read the Reuters article.

Comments (0): Add a comment

C3′s Time for Reflection. C3′s Time for Action.

Posted by Rob Michelson on November 10th, 2006

Editor’s note: Rob Michelson is a two-and-a-half-year survivor of stage IV rectal cancer. He has received radiation, numerous surgeries, and a variety of chemotherapies, and is still undergoing multi-modality treatment. Diagnosed at 37, Rob has managed to continue working nearly full-time, and be a husband and a father of three small boys, ages 7, 5, and 3.

Rob is an active participant in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group’s (ECOG) patient advocate committee, and has recently connected with C3.

As we come off the month of October, I have been reflecting on the colorectal cancer advocacy movement.

October is known in the cancer community and in the world as Breast Cancer Awareness month. As such, it is a difficult month for many of us in other cancer communities, such as colorectal cancer.

While we know that it took decades for October and breast cancer to become synonymous, it is nonetheless frustrating for those of us in the colorectal cancer advocacy community that March seems far away from gaining that level of recognition.

It is helpful at this time to reflect on some facts.

Fact: C3 is new.

It is incredible C3 has come this far in just 18 months in existence. C3 came out of a strong desire to do more than just “making people aware”, more than just “getting people to talk about CRC”, more than just “raising funds for awareness”, more than just “getting together”, more than just “supporting each other”…. C3 is about More. More Action, more Advocate Education, more Legislative Impact, more Funding, more Impact at FDA and NCI , more Research, and more Drugs in the Pipeline.

Fact: Building a base is important.

C3′s greatest asset is building the base, forming relationships in the cancer community, forming relationships with researchers, growing our network of advocates, training these advocates, and forming relationships with those on Capitol Hill.

Cancer does not discriminate by congressional district. Yet as the Hill has been transformed in recent days, we should reconnect with those in our base from districts whose representatives have new power.

These relationships provide immense value over time. These relationships allow us to build C3’s reputation. As C3 builds its reputation with our elected representatives, we gain legitimacy and trust, and empower ourselves to have an effective voice in Washington, and throughout our state capitols.

Relationships we build will lead to greater funding. Funding to colorectal cancer research will grow as we partner with advocates, such as Lisa Dubow, in establishing a dedicated fund to young investigators doing laboratory research focused on colorectal cancer. Since CRC does not discriminate, people in all walks of life – including government, business, entertainment – are affected. As our base grows, so does the potential for newer funding avenues, such as family endowment grants.

Relationships we build also give us a voice at the table with healthcare professionals. Through C3’s research advocacy efforts, CRC advocates are now seated at the table with Oncology Cooperative Groups, hospital Institutional Review Boards, and at conference dinners with researchers. When advocates are at these tables – we are active leaders, we speak with purpose, we speak from experience, and we have receptive audiences. We gain credibility, we learn, and “they” learn from our unique advocate perspective.

These relationships, without a doubt will result in a larger and diverse, yet more organized pool of grassroots advocates. Each of us brings unique talents to the cause, and as we grow our database and really understand each of our grassroots advocates, we will be better able to tap into each other’s unique talents and skills. Tapping into our database will enable us to speak with a more effective voice and make more effective decisions, and deliver a more focused message to those with whom we want to communicate.

I encourage everyone to keep expanding your own personal networks of contacts – and forward them to C3 when you make new ones.

Fact: Focus is important.

Caregivers of survivors and loved ones of those lost to the disease have so much energy, and they are looking both to C3 and within their hearts to determine the best way in which to contribute.

The fact that there is constant dialogue and there are questions on focus is a sign of our success and of our growth. In my own opinion, there is nothing more important than getting new drugs developed, tested, and available to those in life-threatening situations. Others have different areas of focus, and that’s why C3 exists. There are many of us, who decide to associate ourselves with other CRC organizations, too, and that in no way diminishes our commitment to C3.

C3 itself must remain focused. C3 must determine and revisit its mission and goals periodically. C3 must ensure, to the extent possible, that these goals are measurable and align with the mission, and that the actions align with C3’s goals. We must prioritize the tasks to ensure we remain effective and focused.

Fact: Awareness without Action has no Impact

Awareness requires an associated action to have impact. C3 staff have said this to me over and over again, and it took a long time to finally sink in. C3′s efforts are directed to action, thereby getting the most bang for the buck (the “buck” being our collective time and energy). The action can be “to get people screened” or “to meet with your member of Congress” or “to advocate at FDA”. Through action, CRC awareness becomes a free-by product. And that is where CRC efforts up to this point have diverged from AIDS advocacy and breast advocacy. In those successful movements, the advocacy largely preceded the awareness. Most CRC efforts still focus on awareness. C3 advocates through its action – and that’s what gives it its unique focus within the CRC community and gives it an opportunity to transform the movement for greater impact.

For example, this website is all about action. The more traffic we can generate to the website – the more likely people will be to become One-Minute Advocates, and the more likely people will support essential advocacy efforts and efforts to raise and direct research dollars, such as through the Lisa Fund, to researchers who dedicate themselves and their careers to treating and beating CRC through targeted research. As a result, our base grows, and new advocates are spawned to action.

In the end, such actions lead to awareness. The sea of blue stars, pins, and bracelets in March and year-round (with world-wide recognition) will follow soon enough as a natural byproduct of our work.

Comments (0): Add a comment

Specter-Harkin letter sent to Senate leadership

Posted by Dusty Weaver on October 27th, 2006

A letter urging the Senate leadership to provide an additional $7 billion to the Labor-HHS-Education appropriations bill was sent today. The letter, which originated with Senators Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania) and Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), was signed by 57 Senators.

The letter said:

“We, the undersigned, are committed to securing a final Labor-HHS-Education appropriations bill for fiscal year 2007 that includes the additional $2 billion over the fiscal year 2007 Senate Committee bill as intended under the Specter-Harkin amendment to the fiscal year 2007 Senate Budget Resolution. Each of us will work to ensure that this priority funding is contained in the final legislation.”

In March of this year, 73 Senators voted for the Specter-Harkin amendment to the budget resolution to provide an additional $7 billion to programs and services administered by the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education. This includes agencies of interest to the colon and rectal cancer community such as the National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Things changed when the fiscal year 2006 Emergency Supplemental bill containing a “deeming resolution” was enacted which forced the Senate to make significant spending cuts in domestic programs. The Senate Appropriations Committee effectively ignored the intent of the Senate when, on July 20th, it reported out a bill $2 billion short of the $7 billion called for in the Specter-Harkin amendment.

I noticed some interesting things from the information provided by Allen Segal of the American Cancer Society. The first action alert about this letter was sent by C3 September 19 which was also the week ACS held its Celebration on the Hill. During or after this week 43% of the letter’s signatures were collected. This demonstrates the impact of constituents who take informed action and you are to be thanked.

Below are the letter’s signers sorted by state then by Senator’s last name. The italicized date is when the Senator signed the letter.

If your Senator’s name is not on the list one of two things happened:

  1. Your Senator is one of the four Senators to whom the letter was sent. These four members of the Senate leadership are William H. Frist (D-Tennessee), Senate Majority Leader; Senator Thad Cochran (R-Mississippi), Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee; Senator Harry Reid (D-Nevada), Senate Minority Leader; and Senator Robert C. Byrd (D-West Virginia), Ranking Member Senate Appropriations Committee.
  2. Your Senator is one of 39 who did not sign the letter.

If your Senator signed the letter thank him or her for so doing and to remind him or her of the need to follow through on this commitment. If your Senator is one of the leaders to whom the letter was sent urge him to work towards fulfilling the letter’s request. If your Senator is one of those who did not sign tell him or her you are disappointed about this.

Senators who signed the Specter-Harkin letter:

  • Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) 9/28
  • Blanche L. Lincoln (D-Arkansas) 9/27
  • Mark Pryor (D-Arkansas) 9/15
  • Barbara Boxer (D-California) 9/18
  • Dianne Feinstein (D-California) 9/27
  • Ken Salazar (D-Colorado) 9/14
  • Christopher J. Dodd (D-Connecticut) 9/15
  • Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Connecticut) 9/18
  • Joseph R. Biden (D-Delaware) 9/14
  • Thomas R. Carper (D-Delaware) 9/27
  • Bill Nelson (D-Florida) 9/21
  • Daniel K. Akaka (D-Hawaii) 9/15
  • Daniel K. Inouye (D-Hawaii) 9/14
  • Richard J. Durbin (D-Illinois) 9/15
  • Barack Obama (D-Illinois) 9/15
  • Evan Bayh (D-Indiana) 9/28
  • Richard G. Lugar (R-Indiana) 9/18
  • Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) 9/13
  • Pat Roberts (R-Kansas) 9/25
  • Mary Landrieu (D-Louisiana) 9/27
  • Susan M. Collins (R-Maine) 9/18
  • Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) 9/15
  • Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Maryland) 9/15
  • Paul S. Sarbanes (D-Maryland) 9/15
  • Edward M. Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) 9/15
  • John F. Kerry (D-Massachusetts) 9/15
  • Carl Levin (D-Michigan) 9/14
  • Debbie A. Stabenow (D-Michigan) 9/15
  • Norm Coleman (R-Minnesota) 9/22
  • Mark Dayton (D-Minnesota) 9/14
  • Jim Talent (R-Missouri) no date
  • Max Baucus (D-Montana) 9/18
  • Conrad Burns (R-Montana) 9/26
  • Ben Nelson (D-Nebraska) 9/27
  • Frank R. Lautenberg (D-New Jersey) 9/15
  • Robert Menendez (D-New Jersey) 9/25
  • Jeff Bingaman (D-New Mexico) 9/15
  • Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-New York) 9/20
  • Charles E. Schumer (D-New York) 9/19
  • Kent Conrad (D-North Dakota) 10/4
  • Byron L. Dorgan (D-North Dakota) 9/16
  • Mike DeWine (R-Ohio) 9/15
  • Gordon Smith (R-Oregon) 9/20
  • Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) 9/27
  • Rick Santorum (R-Pennsylvania) no date
  • Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania) 9/13
  • Lincoln D. Chaffee (R-Rhode Island) 9/19
  • Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island) 9/19
  • Tim Johnson (D-South Dakota) 9/19
  • Orin G. Hatch (R-Utah) 9/25
  • James M. Jeffords (I-Vermont) 9/14
  • Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vermont) 9/15
  • Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) 9/14
  • Patty Murray (D-Washington) 9/15
  • John D. Rockefeller (D-West Virginia) 9/14
  • Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin) 9/26
  • Herbert H. Kohl (D-Wisconsin) 9/14
Comments (0): Add a comment

Pink Ribbons and Blue Stars

Posted by Dusty Weaver on October 25th, 2006

Last week a co-worker brought a bag of chips to lunch. I noticed a different color on the package and when I looked I saw the color was pink. The package said the company would donate 25 cents to a national breast cancer organization for each proof of purchase returned to the chip manufacturer.

October being Breast Cancer Awareness Month this is not the only pink thing I’ve seen. A cell phone company is selling pink phones. A candy company made a pink version of its popular candy-coated chocolates. There are cans of soup with pink and white labels instead of their normal red and white ones.

Realize it was not always this way. My mother was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1980. Back then there was no special month for breast cancer; no things for the cure; no companies with special merchandise. Pink was just a color and breast cancer, along with cancer in general, just wasn’t talked about.

At the Connect the Dots training C3 held last May just before the One Voice Against Cancer Lobby Day, Jane Reese-Colburne, one of the founders of the National Breast Cancer Coalition, told us about the early days. Back then NBCC consisted of a few women sitting around a dining room table. More than likely this is the same with other high-profile breast cancer groups.

Those affected by breast cancer realized they could do much more collectively than individually so people started to band together to have greater impact. Groups which look so large and successful started small and did what they could with what they had. The highly visible organizations and movements of today were once little more than an idea in someone’s head.

It is easy to feel jealous and even angry when it seems everyone talks about breast cancer yet seem so silent about colon and rectal cancer. It is discouraging when most people know what a pink ribbon means while you have to explain your Blue Star pin every time you wear it. As you deal with these thoughts and feelings remember that our enemy is not pink ribbons but cancer.

Rome was not built in a day. This means those of us associated with C3, along with the colorectal cancer community in general, need to remember it takes time to build a strong and healthy movement able to go the distance.

To get there we need the infrastructure in place to support activities in the field. We need a base of people willing to do what it takes to get the awareness we want, whether that be of the need to be screened or for public policy decisions favorable to our agenda. We need to set goals, plan our work, and work our plan. We need to celebrate our successes and learn from our failures.

Awareness without action has no impact. By focusing on action we get the most bang for the buck and will have the awareness of colon and rectal cancer we so desire. People will see our deeds and the sea of Blue Stars will follow soon enough.

Comments (0): Add a comment

Lame-Duck Session Ahead for Congress…and for Cancer Funding

Posted by Jim Wetekam on October 13th, 2006

Whatever changes are in store for a new 110th Congress convening in January 2007, we know that first the old 109th Congress will re-convene to finish some of its business.

One month from today, on November 13, Congress will reconvene in a “lame duck session.” The shape of the lame duck Congress will be exactly the same as it is today; the session will include those who are retiring and those who lost their election on November 7. And therein lies the origin of the term: “Lame ducks” are elected officials serving after the time when someone else has been selected to take their place and before the new person is actually sworn into office.

Lame duck sessions, therefore, are totally unpredictable. Some wreak great havoc; some are productive; some just go away with a whimper. This one may be long and contentious, or it may be short and sweet.

In any case, the Labor-HHS-Education Appropriation bill, which contains nearly all funding for cancer research and prevention programs, was not decided by the time the 109th Congress recessed on September 29 for the elections. So, one of two things will now likely happen to this bill:

  1. It (and presumably the other eight unresolved appropriation bills for fiscal year 2007) will be finally determined during the lame duck session, or
  2. Congress will be unable to make final decisions on the bill, in which case Congress will:

    a. Pass a longer-term “continuing resolution” which will continue to fund these federal government operations (including NIH, NCI, CDC, etc.) until a time in early 2007, and

    b. The new Congress would be given the task of resolving the final spending bills during the first months of the new year.

We must operate under the assumption that the Labor-HHS bill may be resolved during the lame duck session. Contacts with elected officials during this time in October before the elections are extremely useful to your and our efforts to fund colorectal cancer research, treatment, and prevention (see Dusty Weaver’s post “To Make Cancer an Issue You Have to Ask the Question,” Sept. 30).

But back to what has happened…. During the final weeks of September and the beginning of October, two good developments occurred.

Letters from important Members of each chamber were/are being sent to their respective House or Senate leaders, reiterating the commitment to have the full $7 billion added to the Labor-HHS bill (above what had been requested by the President). From where the bills stood in their incomplete forms on September 29, the Senate bill is currently $2 billion short of this goal and the House is approximately $3 billion short.

As we’ve said before, since cancer programs are funded by the Labor-HHS bill, it is only if Congress grants this full $7 billion increase that programs benefiting colorectal cancer patients – programs for cancer research, treatment and prevention – can be protected. Otherwise, federal cancer programs are likely to receive cuts, or at best, some would receive “flat funding” without an inflation adjustment.

In the House, Rep. Michael Castle (R-DE) organized a letter of just his Republican colleagues, reiterating their commitment to the $7 billion increase in the Labor-HHS bill. The importance of the signatures he gathered is that the House Republican leadership knows that it will most likely need these 24 Members of Congress to pass any Labor-HHS Appropriation bill during a lame duck session.

If you are in the congressional district of one of these letter signers, please thank them for their support and ask that they continue to ensure that Congress provide the full $7 billion to the Labor-HHS-Education Appropriation bill. The signers are:

  • Christopher Shays (CT)
  • Nancy Johnson (CT)
  • Rob Simmons (CT)
  • Michael Castle (DE)
  • Curt Weldon (FL)
  • Judy Biggert (IL)
  • Timothy Johnson (IL)
  • Jim Leach (IA)
  • Wayne Gilchrest (MD)
  • Fred Upton (MI)
  • Joe Schwarz (MI)
  • Jim Ramstad (MN)
  • Jon Porter (NV)
  • Frank LoBiondo (NJ)
  • Sherwood Boehlert (NY)
  • John McHugh (NY)
  • Sue Kelly (NY)
  • Randy Kuhl (NY)
  • Steven LaTourette (OH)
  • Charlie Dent (PA)
  • Jim Gerlach (PA)
  • Michael Fitzpatrick (PA)
  • Todd Platts (PA)
  • Dave Reichert (WA)

In the Senate, Senators Specter (R-PA) and Harkin (D-IA) originated a bi-partisan letter that demonstrates to Senate leadership that more than a majority of the Senate wants the full $7 billion increase in the Labor-HHS bill. (Due to some unexpected changes in leadership decision-making, Senators Specter and Harkin have decided that they must deliver the letter to leadership today rather than after the election, as was originally reported.)

C3 did a great deal of work to garner signatures on the letter, sending targeted action alerts to all states in which we were trying to add signatures. And we know now that over 225 persons responded with email and phone contacts to their Senators’ offices! As of yesterday, 56 Senators in total had signed the letter. This means that 27 new Senators signed the letter since the first action alert was sent out! Thanks and congratulations to all of you for your hard work on the Specter-Harkin letter. This successful effort demonstrates to the Senate leadership that colon and rectal cancer advocates will stand up and be counted, insisting that cancer programs be adequately funded by Congress!

An updated list of signers of the Specter-Harkin letter can be found here. Thank those who signed the letter for their support.

Don’t forget – during October, make sure that all candidates for office know that you want their commitment to providing necessary increases in cancer research, treatment, and prevention funding!

And as always, stay tuned in this space for updates of what’s happening.

Comments (0): Add a comment
Page 62 of 73« First...102030...6061626364...70...Last »