Choosing Wisely: What CancerTests and Treatments Do You Really Need?

Posted by Kate Murphy on April 4th, 2012

Choosing Wisely logoOncologists have joined eight other physician specialty organizations in the Choosing Wisely® campaign with a list of the Top Five Cancer-Related Tests, Procedures, and Treatments That Many Patients Do Not Need.

Choosing Wisely asked each of the specialist groups to come up with a list of five things doctors and patients should question in order to improve evidence-based care, avoid tests or treatments that don’t help, and reduce the burden of health care costs. Here are the Top Five lists from the other groups.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology  built the Top Five List for Oncology, based on work that ASCO’s Cost of Care Task Force has been doing for several years to identify diagnostic tests or treatments that are commonly ordered, expensive, and of unproven value.

While the Top Five list is based on evidence for effective cancer care, its recommendations are not written in stone. They are guidelines for patients, families, and doctors to begin a conversation about tests and treatments and costs in order to make good decisions about the best care for each individual.

Briefly the Top Five list recommends

  1. Stop active cancer treatment when patients are too ill to benefit, aren’t eligible for a clinical trial, previous treatments haven’t worked, and there are no more standard treatment options.
  2. Don’t use advanced imaging tests (CT, PET, bone scans) for early prostate cancer which has a low risk of spreading.
  3. Don’t use similar imaging tests for early breast cancer that has a low risk of spreading.
  4. Don’t use PET, CT, bone scans or biomarkers to follow-up breast cancer patients without symptoms after treatment intended to cure them.
  5. Don’t give medicines to stimulate white cells in patients with a low risk of developing low counts with fever.

More specifically the Top Five for Oncology published ahead of print in the Journal of Clinical Oncology April 3  are: Read the rest of this entry »

Fight Colorectal Cancer Headed for San Francisco and the 2012 GI Symposium

Posted by Kate Murphy on January 11th, 2012
Moscone Center in San Francisco

Moscone Center

We’re getting ready for the 2012 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium next week at the Moscone Center in San Francisco.

Kim Ryan, Nancy Roach, and I will be there checking out the latest colon and rectal cancer prevention and treatment research and talking with leaders in the colorectal cancer field.

Colon and rectal cancer is featured on Saturday, January 21, but we’ll also be looking at research results for cancers in the upper digestive tract, liver, and pancreas on Thursday and Friday, visiting exhibits, and meeting with members of the Fight Colorectal Cancer Medical Advisory Board.

 

Tags: , Comments (0): Add a comment

Doctors Urged to Talk Discuss Palliative Care

Posted by Mary Miller on January 31st, 2011

Soon after diagnosing a patient with advanced cancer, a doctor should begin discussing options for palliative care—the management of symptoms—according to a new policy statement from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).  ASCO also released a new, free guide called Advanced Cancer Care Planning for patients to help initiate those conversations.

Read the rest of this entry »

Young People with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Do As Well with Chemotherapy as Older Patients

Posted by Kate Murphy on June 10th, 2010
Colondar Models

Colondar Models Erika and Cathy

When colorectal cancer spreads to other parts of the body, young people under 50 who get chemotherapy benefit as much as those who are older.

With drug combinations, there is no difference between those under 50 and those who are 50 and older in responding to chemotherapy, how long it takes before cancer gets worse, or in survival time. Read the rest of this entry »

ASCO Advises Oncologists: Test for KRAS Mutations

Posted by Kate Murphy on April 23rd, 2009

The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has published a provisional clinical opinion (PCO) advising doctors to test patients with colorectal cancer for KRAS mutations before treating them with medicines that include Erbitux® (cetuximab) or Vectibix™ (panitumumab).

The consensus of experts who reviewed recent research was that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer whose tumors have mutations in the KRAS gene do not benefit from treatment that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR therapy).  Patients should be tested for KRAS mutations and, if those mutations are found, not receive anti-EGFR antibodies as part of their treatment..

A PCO, based on expert consensus, is designed to help decision-making for oncologists faced with major research results that can potentially change the way they treat patients. Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , Comments (3): Add a comment
Page 1 of 3123