Two Advances in Understanding, Treating Painful Chemo Neuropathy

Posted by Mary Miller on April 23rd, 2013

Recent studies show some promise in understanding chemo-caused neuropathy, and perhaps in using a common medicine to ease the worst symptoms in some people.

Study shows neuropathy relief for some using antidepressant

feet A well-designed clinical study has provided the first evidence that the antidepressant Cymbalta® (duloxetine) can provide some patients with significant relief from peripheral neuropathy caused by chemotherapy.

From 20 to 40 percent of cancer patients given neurotoxic chemotherapy–taxanes, platinum-based including Eloxatin® (oxaliplatin), vinca alkaloids, bortezomib–will develop painful peripheral neuropathy (numbness, tingling, burning in hands or feet). If the pain is severe, colorectal cancer patients often have to reduce the dose or stop taking Eloxatin. Even then, this painful condition can persist for months, even years, after chemotherapy is stopped.

Previous studies have found that Cymbalta eases the neuropathy pain caused by diabetes, but this is the first comprehensive trial testing whether Cymbalta could ease neuropathy from chemotherapy. As reported in the April 3, 2013 JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association), the trial enrolled 220 patients at 8 different cancer centers across the U.S. who still had significant neuropathy (at least 4 on a pain scale of 10) at least 3 months after chemotherapy. (Over half, 129 patients, had taken Eloxatin, mostly for colorectal cancer.) In this randomized, double-blind (neither patients nor clinicians know who’s getting the test drug), crossover trial, one-half the group received Cymbalta for 5 weeks while the others took a placebo, and then the groups switched treatments.

Of those taking Cymbalta, 59% reported at least moderately decreased pain (minimum 1 point on the 10-point scale)—usually within the first week. Among those taking a placebo first, 38% reported decreased relief. Interestingly, Cymbalta-associated pain relief was significant only in feet, not hand, symptoms. Also, 11% of people taking Cymbalta had to stop due to side effects—mostly severe fatigue.

Experts theorize that the antidepressant might help because it reduces the neurotransmitters serotonin and noradrenaline, which deliver pain messages to the brain. The study authors pointed out limitations in this first study: relatively small numbers, the effects measured by patient self-report, and the study only followed patients for 5 weeks on Cymbalta.

However, “This is not just about improving quality of life by decreasing pain, but potentially it’s helping patients live longer because they can get their full chemotherapy treatment,” noted lead author Ellen M. Lavoie Smith, Ph.D., APRN, AOCN, of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Another expert not connected to the study, Marie Bakitas, D.NSc., at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, noted that the trial results weren’t surprising, because duloxetine is already being used in clinics. But, she also told Medscape, other treatments such as physical therapy, acupuncture and massage “are often neglected but can be very useful.”

Sources: Effect of Duloxetine on Pain, Function, and Quality of Life Among Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Painful Peripheral Neuropathy,” April 3 JAMA Network; “Drug for Depression Mutes Chemo Nerve Pain,”April 2 Medscape; “Antidepressant helps relieve pain from chemotherapy, study finds,” April 2 Univ. of Michigan Health Systems press release.

Searching for genes that could predict peripheral neuropathy

scotus-dna-mirror Mayo Clinic researchers have reported that they’ve found that patients with mutations in  three specific genes were more likely to suffer peripheral neuropathy from chemotherapy.

Currently, doctors have no way to predict who will have the side effect, how severe it will get, nor how long it will last.

At the recent meeting of worldwide cancer researchers (AACR, or American Association of Cancer Researchers), scientists described how they studied more than 20,000 specific genes in 119 patients—over half of whom had developed peripheral neuropathy during chemotherapy. They pinpointed three genes, in which mutations were clearly associated with developing neuropathy. Their next step will be to expand their study of the entire genome in as many as 1000 patients. The ultimate goal would be to use these types of genetic clues to potentially predict which patients might suffer side effects from specific drugs.

Fight Colorectal Cancer’s Board Chair Nancy Roach noted that these first findings are a long way from proving cause-and-effect, creating a test, and actually being able to get a reliable test to doctors and patients.

Source: “Gene Variations Predict Chemotherapy Side Effects,”April 9 2013 Science News.

Disclosure: Fight Colorectal Cancer has accepted funding from Sanofi, manufacturer of Eloxatin, in support of its programs. Fight Colorectal Cancer has ultimate authority over website content.

Research and Advocacy

Posted by Danielle Ripley-Burgess on March 29th, 2013

researc-saves-lives-and-moneyThose who go into medical research often have science on the mind.

Not politics.

But researchers who joined us for the 2013 Call-on Congress showed how the two fields merge. Particularly when funding is involved.

Fighting Colorectal Cancer at the Research and Policy Levels

I love how Nancy Roach, Founder and Chair of the Board, explains the importance of advocacy AND research in the One Million Strong PSA,

“I founded Fight Colorectal Cancer in 2006 because people who have been touched by colorectal cancer need a voice at the tables where decisions are being made that impact their survival.” – Nancy Roach

Fighting colorectal cancer demands more than raising awareness of disease. We must also push for funding that enables researchers to get closer to a cure and understand survivorship.

Talking Research

researchers-at-call-on-congress

A fantastic panel of distinguished researchers joined us at the 2013 Call-on Congress:

  • Dan Dixon, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Kansas
  • Andi Dwyer, Project Director for the Colorado Cancer
  • Johanna Bendell, MD, Director of Gastrointestinal Cancer Research and associate director of Drug Development at the Sarah Cannon Research Institute

Great speakers also enlightened us on the impact of research:

  • Max G. Bronstein, MPP, Research!America
  • Camille Bonta, Fight Colorectal Cancer Policy Expert

These professionals trained our advocates about many issues related to advancements in medical research and the federal budget’s impact:

Sequester breakdown flowchart_bipartisonpolicyORG

Federal budget cuts mean cuts in medical research

medical-research-not-deficit-reductionMax Bronstein from Research!America walked us through budget cuts, sequestration and debt ceilings. He showed us how funding cuts impact the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – two big agencies that fuel much of our country’s medical research.

Furthermore, policy expert Camille explained that the cost of doing business (and research) in the U.S. has gone up over the years… but federal budgets have not kept up.

Check out the slides from Max’s presentation: Funding Research in a Time of Fiscal Chaos

Young researchers may be leaving

The United States leads the world in medical research for now; however, Max explained that other countries are gaining on us, if not surpassing us, when it comes to federally-funded medical research.

“Young researchers may be leaving the field. All of us are waiting for new treatments. If we cannot fund research, we may miss out on those opportunities.” – Max Bronstein, Research!America

Read more – Research!America’s Facts About Cancer 2013

advocacy-determines-priorities

Cuts in Research Dollars Hit Home

Andi Dwyer walked us through the specifics of what happens when a research program is cut. She showed us that a center may be shut down, research assistant position eliminated, a program halted, a waiting list lengthened and trials discontinued.

Max also explained the challenging plight of researchers at the NIH who attempt to run massive research programs without a known budget.

Review Andi’s presentation slides: Cancer Survivorship Research

New, EXCITING findings in Colorectal Cancer Research

Although medical research faces challenges, Dr. Bendell shared the hope and advancements in research. She passionately explained how clinical trials increase understanding of colorectal cancer – especially when it comes to biomarkers and tumor classifications.

Understanding the exact type of tumor leads to life-saving treatments designed to combat specific disease states.

Read Dr. Bendell’s slides from her presentation: Promising Agents for CRC Treatment

Researchers Hit the Hill

dan-dixon-senator-roberts

Dan Dixon, PhD, and Senator Roberts from KS

Researchers joining us did not only offer training. Dan, pictured above, met with our RATS team.

Several of them joined us on The Hill. They experienced the power of telling their stories and explaining the importance of research funding with representatives first-hand.

Because the researchers themselves took time to advocate for colorectal cancer on Congress, it got their attention!

See, research and advocacy DO go together.

And Fight Colorectal Cancer makes that happen.

Tuesday Recap | 2013 Call-on Congress

Posted by Danielle Ripley-Burgess on March 20th, 2013

fight-crc-advocate-trainingI’ve never served in the military but I can only imagine what soldiers go through the night before they leave for deployment or battle.

Years of training and preparation lead up to the big day. It’s the military-version of starring on Broadway. It must feel similar to tonight – the hours before we hit the Hill during the Call-on Congress.

The fight against colorectal cancer feels like war sometimes. Battle after battle (or doctor’s visits, scans, surgeries and procedures) create a war on many fronts… whether you’re the patient in the hospital bed or the loved one holding their hand.

But after a day like today’s Call-on Congress, those of us in the fight feel like soldiers.

We’re prepped and ready to take action when it comes to legislation. We understand after today that Capitol Hill needs to get involved if we are going to win this war.

And tomorrow, it’s time to show them why.

Recognizing the research at stake

Yesterday we heard an overview of the importance of research. We received encouragement to channel our passion into advocacy. (Read the Monday recap.)

Today, we got into the nitty-gritty.

Clinical trials offer hope

2013-call-on-congress-speakersDr. Johanna Bendell (Director of Gastrointestinal Oncology Research at the Sarah Cannon Research Institute) delivered a presentation that:

  • Explained the advancements in clinical trials and potential treatments on the horizon.
  • Emphasized the importance of clinical trials.
  • Offered explanations to big concepts in the colorectal cancer world in terms of biomarkers, pathway signaling, inhibitors, gene expressions and more.

Ultimately, she offered passionate insight into colorectal cancer research and treatment options. She injected hope that life-saving therapies sit on the horizon as research continues to receive funding and evolve.

Check out all of the slides to Dr. Bendell’s presentation

Survivorship studies involve millions

group-of-survivors-colon-cancerAndrea Dwyer (Project Director for the Colorado Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network) followed Dr. Bendell with insights into survivorship research. She showed the crowd:

  • A population created by 1 million colorectal cancer survivors and the near 13 million cancer survivors.
  • Efforts of researchers studying the transition from active treatment to survivorship.
  • Benefits of a cancer registry.
  • The impact of budget cuts on survivor research.

Andi encouraged a crowd of survivors and families that resources from survivorship studies will become available with ongoing survivor research.

Check out Andi’s presentation slides.

An Afternoon of Advocacy

fight-crc-folders-statesSurvivors swimming in the details after a morning of powerful presentations knew the clear message of our efforts:  We NEED research in order to find a cure for colorectal cancer. We NEED federal funding.

Fired up with facts (and a good dose of hope), we learned how to best deliver this information to Congress for the remainder of the afternoon.

Advocates sat through discussions, presentations and break-out sessions that discussed topics like:

  • The Research Process
  • The Legislative Process
  • Importance of Engaging in Networks
  • In-depth review of 2013 Legislative Priorities
  • How to Prepare for the Hill
  • How to tell our Stories and Prepare for Pushback
  • How Congress Really Works

training-advocates-fight-crcThanks again to all of the speakers who participated:

  • Nancy Roach (Chair & Founder of Fight Colorectal Cancer)
  • Andi Dwyer (Project Director for the Colorado Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network)
  • Dan Dixon, PhD (Associate Professor at the University of Kansas Cancer Center)
  • Mary Doroshenk (Director of National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable)
  • Camille Bonta (Fight Colorectal Cancer Policy Expert)
  • Carlea Bauman (President of Fight Colorectal Cancer)
  • Anjee Davis (VP of Programs for Fight Colorectal Cancer)
  • Michael Sola (VP of Operations for Fight Colorectal Cancer)
  • Devin James (CEO of Devin James Group)
  • Christoper Kush (President of Soapbox Consulting)
  • Martin B. Gold, MPA, JD

We’re Ready for the Hill

fight-colorectal-cancer-cupcakesA packed agenda of research and policy meetings made for a long day.

But we did get cupcakes in the middle of the afternoon. How sweet.

Tonight, we soak in the policies. Rehearse our stories. Recite the “asks.” Take deep breaths.

Because tomorrow… it’s showtime.

We’re ready to ask for change when it comes to fighting colorectal cancer and federal funds.

We’re here to demand a cure.

Connect With Fight Colorectal Cancer

Want to see more from Day Two – 2013 Call-on Congress?

Read our Twitter and check out Facebook.

Look for hashtag #ConC2013 or tags from @FightCRC

Share your story on the One Million Strong blog and take the One Million Strong pledge.

 

Thanks from…and for…a Lisa Fund Researcher

Posted by Mary Miller on November 22nd, 2012

Pausing today to give thanks for this amazing Fight Colorectal Cancer community, we’d like to especially salute the doctors, nurses, family and friends who work every single day to support people living with colorectal cancer, and to the researchers who devote endless days and nights fighting this disease.

Just before the holiday, we got a final progress report from Dr. Jon Chung, who received the 2011 Lisa Fund grant.  Every single dollar that supported his work came from this community of people who donated to the Lisa Fund, so you should know what your generous donations brought:

“I am extremely grateful for the award of this grant. It has been hugely beneficial in my career. Since the end of the grant funding period, I have been promoted to faculty at Johns Hopkins…As a result of this grant, the laboratory has developed a firm interest in developing [new] inhibitors for Hedgehog signaling…in colorectal cancer—an area of research that had not been previously a focus of the laboratory. I believe that the focus cancer signaling pathways will be a feature of my current and future career as a cancer researcher.”    

Dr. Chung is researching one of the signaling ‘pathways’ that cause colorectal cancer to change from localized to metastatic disease. During his Lisa-funded year, he and his coworkers identified a new gene involved with activating Hedgehog, which eventually could lead to a new biomarker test.

So thank you: Not only did your contributions build a concrete step forward in the fight against metastatic cancer, but you made a life-changing impact on a promising young scientist—and a whole laboratory.

 

At our Thanksgiving tables today, there are a few beloved faces missing—I think of Lisa Dubow, who started the Lisa Fund as thanks for researchers who gave her an extra 9 years of life. And I think of Kate Murphy, who started this blog to bring Research news to you, and who also used her years living with cancer to make a huge impact on countless lives.

In the great circle of life, their legacy lives into the future, thanks to people like Dr. Chung and you in this community.

 Read more: about Dr. Chung’s work,  and Lisa Dubow.

Our Lisa Fund Research

Posted by Michael Sola on February 20th, 2008

In 2006, the LISA FUND was established in honor of Lisa Dubow. At age 42, Lisa was diagnosed with stage III colorectal cancer. As a survivor and advocate she fought for funding to support innovation and science. It took 2 years to raise enough funds to award the first LISA FUND grant to a talented researcher with an emphasis on late stage colorectal cancer.

Since then, we have awarded a grant every year (see graph below). Our goal is to continue to increase financial support for ground-breaking research projects. We are proud to be a part of empowering survivors, research advocates, and scientists across the country to be a driving force for a cure.

Read about the LISA FUND research projects that we have funded in the navigation box on the right.

Visit our DONATION page to make an investment in colorectal cancer research. Each of our research grants has been made possible by generous donations from people like you. In fact, we rely on them. Please help us continue to support cutting-edge research.

Lisa Fund info graph thru 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: , Comments (0): Add a comment